![]() ![]() However, I want as many zombies as possible. This would seem, to an opponent, to be the perfect time to sacrifice or burn his own creature in order to exile Bridge. Of course, the Narcomoebas are put into play when the dredge effect resolves. Maybe I'll take it out for a spin on stream.įurther question about holding priority with this deck.Ĭonsider the example that I have just dredged 20 cards (as a consequence of Breakthrough resolving, say), and among them were 2 Cabal Therapy, 2 Bridge from Below, and 2 Narcomoeba. That being said, here's an updated list as a point of reference:Ģ Pithing NeedleI. ![]() I think there are strengths and weaknesses to playing a variant like this, versus traditional lists. Ultimately, the strength of the pilot and organizational methods with triggers and other abilities still makes the deck completely competitive. I think the existing LED Dredge lists are good enough where (as most of us know), all you need to do is tailor a few cards here and there. Some hands may not even have Foil in them, so maximizing the use of the lands in hand is something I'd like to take advantage of. Since Foil can be pitched to Force of Will, this isn't too big of a deal. The key is ensuring the dual lands can cast the majority of the cards in the deck. It's not a big deal, because instead of rainbow lands, you're effectively using dual lands. I underestimated how difficult it is to build a list using Foil as a resource, because you basically have to build your deck around it. I was tinkering around a lot last night with the list I've been working on. Is it right or have I done something wrong?I think it's definitely reasonable to have DR on the play and Gravestone on the draw in some matchups :) I'd just think about it more generally as "what will be my gameplan in this game?" For quite a few matchups, only one of them really makes sense (eg, boarding in Dread Return/targets against Czech Pile/Miracles probably isn't the most effective, whereas Gravestone's pretty sweet vice versa for Storm, where many of their lists run Gravestone as well :P), but the plan of "race them on the play, grind them on the draw" makes sense to me. On the play, I put only Dread Return, Ashen Rider and Blazing Archon. I will explain with an example: against Turbo Depths, on the draw I put Silent Gravestone and Firestorm (taking out Breakthrough and some Ichorid / Putrid Imp / Streeth Wraith). Is this a different game plan based on being on the draw or on the play? This list features Dread Return and Silent Gravestone, both in the sideboard. Now I'm coming back to play it thanks to this result at the GP, but some things have changed in the meantime. I played Dredge years ago and I have good memories with this deck. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |